Consumer & Competition Law

Your CPA Rights When a Product Fails, Refund, Repair or Replace

A retailer does not automatically get to send every defective product away for repair. During the six-month implied warranty period, the consumer generally has a meaningful choice of remedy.

Your CPA Rights

Understanding your CPA rights when a product fails starts with a practical question: can you choose a refund, repair or replacement, or must you accept whatever the retailer offers? During the six month implied warranty period, the consumer generally directs the remedy when the goods fail to meet the required legal standards.

That matters when a washing machine stops working, a newly purchased laptop repeatedly shuts down or an appliance becomes unsafe during ordinary use. A retailer’s internal repair procedure does not automatically determine your legal rights.

The Consumer Protection Act, commonly called the CPA, provides a quality guarantee for qualifying transactions. To use it effectively, explain the problem clearly, preserve the evidence and state the remedy you are requesting.

Start with the basic promise

Section 55 of the CPA sets standards for the goods consumers receive. These include reasonable suitability for their ordinary purpose, good quality, working order, freedom from defects and durability for a reasonable period.

What is reasonable depends on the circumstances, including the product’s use, how it was marketed and the conditions in which it was supplied.

A product does not have to be expensive to qualify for protection. Equally, reasonable expectations should reflect what was actually sold. A used appliance with a clearly disclosed condition may raise different questions from a new appliance advertised as suitable for demanding daily use.

The manufacturer’s warranty is a separate protection

A manufacturer may offer a warranty describing its repair process, covered components and claim requirements. That promise can provide additional protection, but it cannot override the applicable CPA requirements.

The Consumer Goods and Services Ombud, known as the CGSO, explains that warranties and store policies may give consumers more rights than the Act requires.

Ask the supplier which protection it is applying. “The manufacturer only authorises repairs” does not, by itself, answer a complaint based on the statutory implied warranty.

Within six months, your choice matters

Section 56 permits a consumer to return qualifying goods within six months after delivery if they fail to satisfy the section 55 standards. The return is without penalty and at the supplier’s risk and expense.

The supplier must then, at the consumer’s direction, repair or replace the goods, or refund the price paid.

The National Consumer Commission, known as the NCC, has specifically addressed suppliers who incorrectly assume that they always choose the remedy.

Calculate the period from delivery

Record both the purchase date and the delivery date. They may be different, particularly where an item was ordered in advance.

For example, a refrigerator paid for on 5 March but delivered on 20 March has a different delivery date from the transaction date. Keep the delivery record with the invoice.

Act promptly when a problem appears. Reporting a defect close to the end of the period and then waiting without arranging the return can create an avoidable dispute about timing.

The nature of the problem still matters

A failure does not automatically establish every element of a refund claim. The condition of the goods, the seriousness of the fault and the evidence remain relevant.

The CGSO’s guidance recognises that insignificant or minor defects may be treated differently. It would therefore be unwise to assume that a small cosmetic issue necessarily gives the same remedy as a product that is unsafe or unusable.

Describe what the item does incorrectly and how that affects its intended use. “It is defective” is a conclusion. “It switches off after five minutes during normal operation” gives the supplier something specific to investigate.

Assessment should establish the facts

Some defects are obvious. Others require technical examination to determine what failed and why.

The CGSO explains that an inspection may help distinguish a product defect from damage caused by misuse, although the CPA does not expressly set out a general inspection procedure.

Separate assessment from permission to repair

When handing over an item, state your requested remedy in writing. If you are authorising assessment only, make that clear and check the job card before signing.

Ask for:

  1. Confirmation of the item and its condition.
  2. A description of the reported fault.
  3. An estimated assessment timeframe.
  4. A written technical outcome.
  5. Confirmation of any proposed next step.

These requests help prevent a later disagreement about whether you agreed to a repair.

Keep following up if the assessment takes longer than expected. A vague statement that the item is “with the supplier” should be followed by a request for a progress update and expected response date.

What the protection does not automatically cover

Consumer protection does not make every damaged product the supplier’s responsibility.

An item dropped onto concrete, exposed to unsuitable conditions or used contrary to clear instructions may present a different case from one that fails during ordinary use.

A disclosed condition that the consumer expressly accepted can also affect the applicable rights. Alterations to the goods may affect the implied warranty.

Ask for evidence when misuse is alleged

If the retailer says the damage was caused by you, request the assessment supporting that conclusion.

A useful report should identify the damage and explain its relationship to the failure. A verbal statement that “the technician says misuse” gives you little information with which to understand or challenge the decision.

Be equally accurate about your own use. Tell the supplier about drops, repairs, unusual conditions or other events that may be relevant.

Ordinary wear also needs context. Wear that is expected after substantial use differs from unexpectedly early failure during normal use. Explain the history rather than assuming every worn component proves a manufacturing defect.

Do not let the complaint become vague

A clear complaint should allow someone unfamiliar with the transaction to understand it quickly.

Include:

  1. The product name, model and identifying details.
  2. The purchase and delivery dates.
  3. Proof of the transaction.
  4. The date the problem first appeared.
  5. A factual description of the failure.
  6. Relevant photographs, videos or reports.
  7. The remedy you are requesting.

A photograph of an error message or video of an intermittent fault can be useful where the problem does not appear every time the product is tested.

Use a short written request

For example:

“I received the appliance on 12 June. During normal use, it stops midway through each cycle and displays the attached error message. I reported this on 8 August. I request a refund under the CPA implied warranty provisions and ask you to confirm the arrangements for assessment and return.”

Adapt the wording to your actual circumstances. Do not claim that a technical cause has been established unless you have evidence supporting it.

Keep emails, collection slips, job cards and reference numbers together. After a telephone conversation, send a short email recording what was agreed.

What if the repair does not solve the problem?

Section 56(3) provides further protection after a supplier repairs goods or a component. If, within three months after that repair, the problem remains or another failure, defect or unsafe feature is discovered, the supplier must replace the goods or refund the price paid.

Keep the repair paperwork and record the date the goods were returned to you. If a problem reappears, report it promptly and explain whether it is the original fault or a new one.

This provision does not describe an unlimited series of repair attempts. Ask the supplier to address the replacement or refund obligation where its requirements are met.

Store credit is not automatically a refund

Where a consumer is entitled to a refund, a voucher should not simply be imposed as the substitute.

The CGSO states that a consumer can insist on a monetary refund rather than store credit. Its guidance also says the supplier may not force the consumer to purchase a more expensive model or brand.

You may choose to accept an alternative arrangement. Before doing so, check the value, restrictions, expiry terms and whether accepting it settles the complaint.

If a replacement model is proposed, compare its relevant specifications. Clarify what is being offered and whether any additional payment is requested before agreeing.

Original packaging and a change of mind are different issues

The CGSO explains that section 56 does not require defective goods to be returned in their original packaging.

A store’s voluntary policy for returning an undamaged item because the buyer changed their mind may impose different conditions. Other statutory return rights may also apply in particular circumstances.

Tell the retailer clearly whether you are reporting a failure or asking for a discretionary exchange. The reason for the return determines which rules need to be considered.

Escalate the complaint in stages

Start with the retailer’s complaints department or manager. Send the evidence, explain the remedy requested and ask for a written response.

If unresolved, identify the appropriate ombud or regulatory route. The CGSO handles complaints within its scope, while some industries have separate arrangements.

The NCC also provides a complaints portal. Its guidance asks consumers to include transaction details, proof of purchase, the date the dispute arose and previous communication with the supplier.

A manufacturer’s warranty, insurance policy or payment dispute process may offer additional options. Check their requirements promptly while continuing to preserve the evidence supporting your consumer complaint.

The practical rule

The CPA implied warranty gives consumers meaningful remedies when qualifying goods fail to meet the required standards. Using those rights effectively requires an accurate account of the failure, timely action and a clear request.

Consumers should be honest about use and damage. Suppliers should investigate properly, explain their findings and apply the legal remedy rather than rely solely on an internal returns policy.