You want to understand how a decision was made, but the organisation holds the paperwork. Perhaps it is an inspection report, a contract or a record about your own affairs. An informal request has gone unanswered. The Promotion of Access to Information Act, known as PAIA, provides a structured route to seek access to existing records.
A good PAIA request begins with a precise description of the information needed. It should help the body identify the records and enable you to track the legal process if access is refused or no decision arrives.
Ask for records, not a new investigation
PAIA concerns access to records held by public and private bodies, subject to its requirements and exclusions. It is not generally a mechanism requiring an organisation to create a report, answer every question or investigate an allegation for you.
Instead of asking, “Why did you ignore my street?”, identify the records that could answer the question. You might request the inspection report, work order and recorded decision concerning a named fault during a stated period.
The government’s access to information service page explains the basic public body process. A narrow description with dates and references is usually easier to process than a demand for every record about an entire department.
Public and private bodies have different access tests
For a public body, a requester generally does not need to establish the same rights based justification required for access to a private body’s records. For a private body, explain the right you seek to exercise or protect and why the requested record is required for that purpose.
For example, a request to a business might explain that a particular record is needed to assess a contractual right. Merely saying that the information would be interesting may not satisfy the test.
The Information Regulator’s PAIA guide explains the distinctions, refusal grounds and remedies. Use the organisation’s PAIA manual to identify its information officer and available record categories.
Use the prescribed form and keep it specific
The Regulator’s PAIA forms page provides the prescribed forms, including Form 2 for an access request. Complete the requester details, record description, preferred form of access and any required explanation of rights.
Include identifiers that help locate the record, such as an application number, property description or date range. If you do not know the exact title, describe the record by its function and subject. Explain that you seek existing records rather than a newly compiled answer.
If you act for somebody else, provide the necessary authority. Avoid sending unnecessary personal documents. Ask the information officer what is required to verify identity or representation, and use a suitable secure channel.
Choose a usable form of access
Consider whether you need electronic copies, inspection or another available form. An electronic request for a manageable set of documents can be more practical than a large paper bundle, but the available format and statutory rules matter.
If the record is a spreadsheet, explain whether you need the underlying electronic file rather than a printout. If a map is central to the issue, ask for a legible copy. The purpose is to obtain something you can actually examine.
Ask about any applicable fees and exemptions. Do not assume access is always free, or that every amount requested is automatically lawful. Keep the fee notice and seek clarification of the basis if it is unclear.
Track the decision period
PAIA generally requires a decision within 30 days, with an extension of up to a further 30 days permitted in specified circumstances. Record the date the request was received and keep proof of delivery.
An acknowledgement is not necessarily the decision. If an extension is invoked, read the reasons and calculate the revised period. If the body says it does not hold the records, ask whether the request must be transferred or whether another body should be approached.
Keep a short chronology: request, acknowledgement, fee notice, extension and decision. That makes a later complaint easier to assess. Repeatedly submitting fresh versions without explaining their relationship can create confusion about what remains outstanding.
A refusal must be examined against the Act
Access is not unlimited. Privacy, legally protected confidentiality and other statutory grounds can justify refusal in appropriate circumstances. Some records are excluded from PAIA’s operation altogether. The existence of a public interest in a subject does not automatically settle every access question.
Ask for the specific ground relied upon and consider whether part of the record can be released with protected information removed. A refusal of an entire document may need a different assessment from the withholding of particular passages.
PAIA also has provisions affecting records requested for litigation where proceedings have commenced and another law provides access. Obtain advice before treating PAIA as a substitute for discovery or another court process.
Use the correct challenge route
Certain public body decisions carry an internal appeal, generally to be lodged within 60 days. That statutory internal appeal must be exhausted where applicable. Private bodies do not have the same mandatory PAIA internal appeal route.
The Regulator’s current PAIA explanation describes complaints where access is refused or there is no response, including the generally applicable 180 day complaint period. Check the trigger date and process for your case rather than counting from an informal telephone call.
Use the prescribed complaint form and include the request, proof of delivery, response or evidence of silence and any required appeal documents. Explain the outcome sought. A service complaint about poor communication may not replace a formal challenge to refusal.
Make the request easy to follow
A PAIA file does not need to be elaborate. It needs a clear request, the correct recipient and a reliable record of dates and documents. Keep original versions and avoid changing the request informally without confirmation.
The strongest starting point is often one sentence identifying the records, one sensible date range and a clear explanation where the rights based test applies. Precision gives the information officer something concrete to locate and gives you a better basis for challenging an inadequate response.
Related reading: Administrative & Public Law; How to ask for your medical records in South Africa; Reporting a pothole or water leak: how to escalate an unresolved fault; AARTO traffic fine changes: what started in July 2026?.
